Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart


Pennsylvania Property Rights Association



Setting the Stage for a New School Property Tax Elimination Bill!

Posted by Jim Rodkey on January 30, 2019 at 4:30 PM

Note: This is the first part of a series of articles intnended to introduce HB13.  We will explore why we feel this new step is important to the process and the advantages of working through this new concept in School Property Tax Elimination.

As we move closer to seeing HB13 move from being proposed legislation to becoming an actual bill, we felt it was time to bring others up to speed on what is happening. Before we do so, we thought it would be beneficial to discuss one particular aspect concerning School Property Tax Elimination.

If any legislation regarding School Property Tax Elimination is to pass, the “Political Will” to do so has to be generated. The fact of the matter is that, while we all know that the school property tax system has problems, the degree of those problems is not generally recognized across the state.

In our opinion, and in our experiences through the countless town halls in which we have participated, the problem is generally recognized among the people but, legislatively, the problem is often diminished or, in the most extreme cases, dismissed. We’ve had more than our share of legislators who tell us it is not a problem in their district and yet, in town hall after town hall, we find the exact opposite to be true when we speak directly with the constituents in that district.

Furthermore, the amendment advanced by the legislative body clearly demonstrates that the problem is recognized by a very large percentage of the people across the state. Overwhelmingly, the state voted to move to some alternative to funding education other than the property tax. While this should have sent a clear message to our legislators, the political system has this awkward habit of spinning everything while looking for political expediency rather than doing the right thing because it’s the right thing to do. That may not be as much of a political issue as it is a part of human nature. We tend to seek the path of least resistance; to look for the easiest path and, at present, disregarding the long-term impact of School Property Taxation is the easiest path. However, if we continue down this unsustainable path, failing to recognize those long-term effects, we will reach point where something will have to be done and by that time, no matter what is done, the damage created by ignoring those long-term issues, will be very difficult to overcome.

The cold hard fact is that it isn’t going to be enough just to force a vote on any school property tax elimination bill. As it stands right now, any proposed legislation will fail because the political will to do the right thing simply isn’t there. That may frustrate you. It may even make you angry. Frustration and anger, however, is not enough.

Looking for the path of least resistance is not our only problem. We also have to concern ourselves with something identified as the “normalcy bias”. This is the belief that causes people to underestimate both the likelihood of a disaster and its possible effects, because people believe that things will always function the way things normally have functioned. It’s sort of an inherent safety valve that prevents many people from understanding the devasting long-term impact of following an unsustainable course of action.

It is not a problem unique to politicians. It is a problem with the larger society as a whole.

As bad as things are with the property tax at this point in time, the inescapable long-term conclusion, confirmed though the Independent Fiscal Office by studying historical increases in property taxation is that the school property tax burden will double in about 18 years. If wages do not match that increase coupled to keeping the cost of living in alignment to the increased property tax burden, we have a recipe for disaster concerning home-ownership. The historical record demonstrates that wages will not match the increased demand through property taxation and that cost-of-living, as a result of this we will see less money to provide for the revenue demanded through property taxation. In other words, in 18 years, we reach that point of absolute unsustainability. At that point in time, the replacement revenue for school property taxes will have doubled.

Let’s make this clear: if Pennsylvania wants to increase the percentage of out-migrating young working families while generating more government dependency programs, than it should stay on the path it is on. We should all understand the consequences of following that path. Less working age families means less state PIT and SUT income to fund these government programs and that places a higher funding burden on those still living in the Commonwealth.

The third aspect in play is that, while the majority may want to see property taxes eliminated, we cling to this notion that shifting to a different system for replacement revenue should include everybody but our specific group. Many may be perfectly fine with carving out exemptions for specific groups, as we’ve done with Keystone Opportunity Zones (KOZs), Local Economic Revitalization Tax Assistance (LERTAs), Clean and Green and other programs that provide property tax relief by passing that burden on to other working families but, again, we have to consider the long-term implications of doing so. We hear the same narratives when it comes to creating Senior exemptions.

The revenue for education funding has to be generated and every exemption, regardless of how necessary it may seem on the surface, only spreads that revenue demand to fewer people creating greater burdens for that dwindling tax base. This is a band-aid approach to a much larger problem that, rather than solving problems, generally results in creating a whole set of new problems.

When it comes to funding education, the future of our children should be everyone’s responsibility. We may all agree in the importance of a sound education, where we disagree is who should pay for it.

Right now, the lion’s share of that funding comes from our family homes. Since this system is not based on ability to pay, it creates some very serious implications. We also know, regardless of how it is framed, the school property tax system is a system that is rife with inequality issues generating a very regressive education funding system that already dramatically impacts the younger working families in this Commonwealth.

We can continue to ignore that or we can face the harsh reality that property taxation is one of the reasons we see dwindling rates of home-ownership, increases in rent, out-migration of young working families, while contributing to the problems of blight and abandoned properties. Government programs created to “help” in these instances may sound good on the surface, but all government programs require government funding and that increases the tax burden on the very working families that these programs as claimed as help by the government. Those government programs require the establishment of more bureaucracies to maintain them and all of that comes at a cost to the tax payer. In many cases, the long-term cost outweighs any benefits we may see in the short-term.

Over the past year, PAPRA, in working with Frank Ryan, State representative for the 101st district in Pennsylvania, has spent countless hours discussing each of the aspects in attempting to create a strategic narrative in advancing School Property Tax Elimination. We know that, in order to generate the political will to do this, all of these points must become a part of internal narrative within the political body. These points must be driven home to generate the political will to bring about the total elimination of the School Property Tax, paving the way for alternative means for the future complete elimination of all Property Taxation.

At the same time, Frank Ryan has been meeting with other legislators which has opened doors of communication previously unexplored in the property tax debate. These new areas have created more input and discussions that potentially make a very good proposal even better. Having other legislative input is healthy because it brings in unique perspectives that are common in one County or district that is uncommon in other areas. It allows us to address each of these issues and look for the best overall solution for the entire state.

Having other voices in this process has proven to be healthy and a much needed part of generating the political will necessary for School Property Tax Elimination to happen. At the same, these discussion lead to more legislative conversations that all draw attention to the many problems associated with Property Taxation. The more that these problems are openly discussed, the greater the chances we have in drawing attention to the long-term negative impact of staying on the current path.

The goal here is school property tax elimination. To do that we need to generate the replacement revenue and that revenue should be provided in a way that is as equitable as possible while maintaining the Constitution requirements of tax uniformity preventing future substantive court challenges. I believe that we are steadfastly on the path and have created a much stronger support network in the process.

As I stated, the goal here is elimination and, like it or not, to get to that goal we need 102, 26 and 1: the votes necessary from the house, senate and governor for approval. For a proposal making its way to becoming a bill, we’re on a solid path to building a strong legislative coalition and, and least to me, that’s good news.







Categories: None

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In


Reply irraceaps
2:08 PM on January 28, 2022 
Posologie Cialis Tadalafil Plaquenil Direct Isotretinoin Next Day Delivery Discount
Reply irraceaps
4:09 PM on January 29, 2022 
Pfzctm Plaquenil
Reply buy cialis
2:33 AM on January 31, 2022 
tadalafil price walmart
Reply irraceaps
7:23 AM on January 31, 2022 
Gfuuvd Plaquenil
Reply tadalafil generic where to buy
5:16 AM on February 1, 2022 
cialis at canadian pharmacy tadalafil drug
Reply irraceaps
4:22 PM on February 1, 2022 
Rwujjp cialis and fertility Plaquenil
Reply oridotsze
6:04 PM on February 1, 2022 cialis at canadian pharmacy
Reply tadalafil daily online
10:11 AM on February 2, 2022 
tadalafil liquid tadalafil generic where to buy
Reply tadalafil dosage
10:45 AM on February 2, 2022 
cheapest tadalafil cost
Reply Jonathonqas
9:06 PM on February 2, 2022 
Meet the random quarantine family

As Jenson cries tougher, Newman bounces quicker, Rubbing the baby's back. Eventually, treatment comes. which he burps.Story continues below advertisementThe coronavirus pandemic is leaving people in a lot of limbo: Grandparents who have yet to meet new grandchildren. Students who are putting off life on campus. Long distance couples who don't know the next occasion they'll embrace.In this extended state of between, New bonds of state of affairs are being formed. Neighbors who rarely socialized with each other are holding happy hours on adjacent porches and driveways. Craigslist roommates get genuine friends. And with a simple Airbnb booking, a us couple, very own two dogs, A Chinese couple and their set of newborn twins have created an unexpected temporary family in a Salt Lake City suburb.It's another significant element "imagine if, Fantasy that's common on christmas, But this is not a holiday for Laura and Ben. It's a well planned intercontinental trek to expand their family.the pair, Who struggled with pregnancy, caused a surrogate, Which isn't given in China. (The couple spoke on the disorder that only English versions of their first names be used, being a China's distaste for surrogacy.) hoping for two babies, Laura and her American surrogate each did a round of in vitro feeding with Laura's eggs and Ben's sperm. Laura's never work, nevertheless the surrogate's did. A single egg split into two, giving them two boys.Story may keep below advertisementIn late January, As China was restraining travel, the couple worried that if they waited any longer, They wouldn't be able to get to Utah to meet their sons. They booked a flight for in the mail, Arriving in los angeles, Where they self isolated for 14 days, Before on trips north to Newman and Fudge's basement.Their initial booking was for a month; So far it's been in excess of what three. Laura and Ben can't return to China until the babies' passports arrive, A process that can usually be expedited but not in the midst of a pandemic. Laura jokes that they will have to stay until the boys are old enough to call Newman "granny,Laura says the couple initially chose the Airbnb rental for the proximity to Weber State University (Where Fudge and Newman are both mentors), judgement that, In cina, Areas near colleges are usually safer. a long way, Weber regional, Where Newman and Fudge's home can be found, Has a relatively low rate of covid 19 infections per person as compared to the rest of the country.continues to be, Laura is astonished at Americans' lax procedure to mask wearing. "In china and tiawan, when folks know there is coronavirus outside, They just rarely leave the house. That's part one, Laura predicts. "as well as the second part, everyone wear masks. or else, They just work. these, outside of the restaurant, some individuals still didn't wear masks,Being in the same physical space with visitors gets intimate quickly. Newman and Fudge can hear after babies are crying downstairs, When Laura and Ben are laughing or when Laura is lecturing her 8 year old daughter back in China to accomplish her homework. (She's sticking to a neighbor.) Laura has told Newman many times, "Your bond is so good, to which Newman responds: "Our relationships is easy, It's their second partnership for both of them; They have a home with sufficient of space and a yard to keep them busy,Your marriage is very good because look at all the worries you're under, Newman claims of Laura and Ben, While they're still getting along, And cheerful day-after-day. Laura oftentimes says, "it doesn't matter, regardless of, About dysfunctions that aren't important.They had practice hunkering down they lived through remote location during covid 19's spread in China. But Laura worried about caring for twins on their own while in the united states. When their daughter was developed, They had so much help from family that Laura barely had to alter a single diaper. "I revealed to Ben: 'You should remember that we are a team. Never quarrel with one another. Cooperate jointly. If we have some difficulties, Just get it at the same time.or,-- "WpRequest for Reader SubmissionTell us how the coronavirus crisis has affected a relationship or your experience living aloneThe Washington Post plan to hear from you. How has social distancing changed your link with a romantic partner, friend? Have you started a new break up? Have you been quarantined aware of an ex or amid a divorce? If you or someone you know has contracted the coronavirus, How has that affected a romance? What is living alone like right now?We respect your privacy and will not publish your name or response without contacting you first. Read our full syndication guidelines here.
Reply Stoosodsojkv
2:46 AM on February 3, 2022 
tadalafil online cost of cialis
Reply oridoqozr
11:02 PM on February 3, 2022 
tadalafil cost walmart tadalafil cost in canada
Reply Judydaymn
2:13 AM on February 4, 2022 
price comparison tadalafil
Reply Serglapit
8:40 AM on February 4, 2022 
????????????. ?????? ??? ?????? ???????? ? ????? ??????. ?????? ??? ????? ??????????, ?????????? ??? ??????????? ??????? ?????. ? ??????? ????????? ??????? ?????? ?????????? ???. ??????? ???????????, ???? ?????????, ???????? ??????????.

???????? ??????? ???? ????????????:

1. ??????????? ?????? ? ????????? ????????. ?????? ??????? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ?????????????? ??? ??? ??????? ????????.

2. ?????????? ??????????? ? ??????? ???? ??????? ? ??????. ?????? ??????? ??? ???? ??????????? ???????????? ? ??????????????? ??????????? ????????? ??????. ???? ??? ???????? (?? ???? ? ?? ???????).

3. ???????? ??????. ????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????.

4. ???????? ? ??????????? ????? ? ??????? ? ?????????? ????? (????, ??, ??????? ? ?. ?.).

5. ?????? ? ????????. ???????? ? ??????????? ??????? ??????? ? ?????????, ???????? ? ?????????? ????????? ??????.

6. ?????????? ? ?????? ???? ? ??? ? ??? ?? ??? ????????? ????????. ??????? ??? ? ?????????????, ??? ? ? ??????????????? ?????????.

???? ??? ??????????????, ?? ?????? ?? ????????? ?????: [email protected]
Reply skyreveryPhync
5:06 PM on February 4, 2022 
???????? ??????? ??????? ? ????????? ??? ?????????? ??????-???? - SkyRevery - ????????? ?? ????? ?????
?????? ???????? ???????? ? ???????? ? ???????? SkyRevery – ??? ????? ???, ??? ????? ???? ????? ? ????? ?? ?????? ??????????!
?????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ????? ?????? ?????? – ?????. ????????? ??????? ???????, ?????? ?? ???????, ????? ? ???? ????????. ??? ?????????? ????????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ????????????, ????????????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ? ???????????? ??????. ???????????? ?????????????? ? ?????????????????????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ??????????? ???????? ? ???????.
????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????? ??????, ?? ????? ???????????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????????? ?? 3 ????? ? ??????? ?????????????.
Reply oridouvbs
11:12 PM on February 4, 2022 
lowest price cialis
Reply buy cialis online
11:38 PM on February 4, 2022 
buy generic cialis online with mastercard tadalafil cost walmart
Reply ZTeksKNlhq
4:28 AM on February 5, 2022 
Reply buy cialis
7:30 AM on February 6, 2022 
side effects of tadalafil where to order tadalafil tablets
Reply cheapest tadalafil cost
1:28 AM on February 8, 2022 
tadalafil order online no prescription lowest price cialis